Review




Structured Review

SourceForge net ica of fmri toolbox software gift version 4.0b
Ica Of Fmri Toolbox Software Gift Version 4.0b, supplied by SourceForge net, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/ica of fmri toolbox software gift version 4.0b/product/SourceForge net
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
ica of fmri toolbox software gift version 4.0b - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
90/100 stars

Images



Similar Products

96
MathWorks Inc fmri toolbox gift software
Fmri Toolbox Gift Software, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/fmri toolbox gift software/product/MathWorks Inc
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
fmri toolbox gift software - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
MathWorks Inc ica of fmri toolbox (gift) matlab software
Ica Of Fmri Toolbox (Gift) Matlab Software, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/ica of fmri toolbox (gift) matlab software/product/MathWorks Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
ica of fmri toolbox (gift) matlab software - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

96
MathWorks Inc fmri toolbox gift matlab software
(A) The within‐network reliability analysis across three experimental trials (Trials 1, 2, and 3: <t>BOLD‐fMRI</t> scan at Days 0–1, Days 2–3, and Days 4–5, respectively) was assessed by the MN sub‐networks in the sham control group. No significant difference was observed in any sub‐networks. (B). The within‐network reliability across three trials was assessed by the MN sub‐networks in the KA group. A significantly large ICA intensity was observed in Trial 2 vs. Trial 1 in the PrR, Trial 2 vs. Trial 1 in the DHpL, and Trial 3 vs. Trial 2 in the DHpR. One asterisk (*) identifies adjusted P values lower than 0.1. (C). Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) reflects the test–retest reliability in four MN sub‐networks in the sham rats and KA rats. It indicated a low‐to‐excellent reliability in sham, while the average reliability dropped in the KA group.
Fmri Toolbox Gift Matlab Software, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/fmri toolbox gift matlab software/product/MathWorks Inc
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
fmri toolbox gift matlab software - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
MathWorks Inc gica in the ica of fmri toolbox (gift) matlab software
Main networks (MNs) extracted by <t>group</t> <t>ICA</t> and averaged across all experimental trials. The ICA intensity (z‐map) ranged from 0 to 6.5 and represents the significant functional connectivity in each MN. All the MNs were overlaid on a co‐registered rat brain mask to aid structural identification. (A). Axial view of the selected MNs in the sham control rats of the frontal cortex network (FCN, including the orbital frontal and medial frontal cortex areas), hippocampal network (HPN, including the hippocampal and parahippocampal areas), thalamic network (THN, including the thalamus and hypothalamus areas), and the sensorimotor network (SMN, including primary and secondary motor cortex). (B). Similar MNs identified in the KA rats. (C). Unsupervised ROI extraction of the sub‐regions in RSFNs. The MNs (solid blue color) overlay to their sub‐regions as referred to in the rat brain atlas, where: C1. FCN overlays on cingulate cortex (green), prelimbic cortex (yellow), and retrosplenial cortex (red); C2. HPN overlays on dorsal (green) and ventral (yellow) hippocampus; C3. THN overlays on thalamus (green); and C4. SMN overlays on primary (yellow) and secondary (green) motor cortex. (D). The normalized area of coverage, which was computed by the percentage of the sub‐regions that were covered by the RSFNs. (E). Summary of all ROIs in the rat brain template.
Gica In The Ica Of Fmri Toolbox (Gift) Matlab Software, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/gica in the ica of fmri toolbox (gift) matlab software/product/MathWorks Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
gica in the ica of fmri toolbox (gift) matlab software - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Anton Paar gift software
Main networks (MNs) extracted by <t>group</t> <t>ICA</t> and averaged across all experimental trials. The ICA intensity (z‐map) ranged from 0 to 6.5 and represents the significant functional connectivity in each MN. All the MNs were overlaid on a co‐registered rat brain mask to aid structural identification. (A). Axial view of the selected MNs in the sham control rats of the frontal cortex network (FCN, including the orbital frontal and medial frontal cortex areas), hippocampal network (HPN, including the hippocampal and parahippocampal areas), thalamic network (THN, including the thalamus and hypothalamus areas), and the sensorimotor network (SMN, including primary and secondary motor cortex). (B). Similar MNs identified in the KA rats. (C). Unsupervised ROI extraction of the sub‐regions in RSFNs. The MNs (solid blue color) overlay to their sub‐regions as referred to in the rat brain atlas, where: C1. FCN overlays on cingulate cortex (green), prelimbic cortex (yellow), and retrosplenial cortex (red); C2. HPN overlays on dorsal (green) and ventral (yellow) hippocampus; C3. THN overlays on thalamus (green); and C4. SMN overlays on primary (yellow) and secondary (green) motor cortex. (D). The normalized area of coverage, which was computed by the percentage of the sub‐regions that were covered by the RSFNs. (E). Summary of all ROIs in the rat brain template.
Gift Software, supplied by Anton Paar, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/gift software/product/Anton Paar
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
gift software - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Dassault Systemes gift-in-kind software
Main networks (MNs) extracted by <t>group</t> <t>ICA</t> and averaged across all experimental trials. The ICA intensity (z‐map) ranged from 0 to 6.5 and represents the significant functional connectivity in each MN. All the MNs were overlaid on a co‐registered rat brain mask to aid structural identification. (A). Axial view of the selected MNs in the sham control rats of the frontal cortex network (FCN, including the orbital frontal and medial frontal cortex areas), hippocampal network (HPN, including the hippocampal and parahippocampal areas), thalamic network (THN, including the thalamus and hypothalamus areas), and the sensorimotor network (SMN, including primary and secondary motor cortex). (B). Similar MNs identified in the KA rats. (C). Unsupervised ROI extraction of the sub‐regions in RSFNs. The MNs (solid blue color) overlay to their sub‐regions as referred to in the rat brain atlas, where: C1. FCN overlays on cingulate cortex (green), prelimbic cortex (yellow), and retrosplenial cortex (red); C2. HPN overlays on dorsal (green) and ventral (yellow) hippocampus; C3. THN overlays on thalamus (green); and C4. SMN overlays on primary (yellow) and secondary (green) motor cortex. (D). The normalized area of coverage, which was computed by the percentage of the sub‐regions that were covered by the RSFNs. (E). Summary of all ROIs in the rat brain template.
Gift In Kind Software, supplied by Dassault Systemes, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/gift-in-kind software/product/Dassault Systemes
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
gift-in-kind software - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
SourceForge net ica of fmri toolbox software gift version 4.0b
Main networks (MNs) extracted by <t>group</t> <t>ICA</t> and averaged across all experimental trials. The ICA intensity (z‐map) ranged from 0 to 6.5 and represents the significant functional connectivity in each MN. All the MNs were overlaid on a co‐registered rat brain mask to aid structural identification. (A). Axial view of the selected MNs in the sham control rats of the frontal cortex network (FCN, including the orbital frontal and medial frontal cortex areas), hippocampal network (HPN, including the hippocampal and parahippocampal areas), thalamic network (THN, including the thalamus and hypothalamus areas), and the sensorimotor network (SMN, including primary and secondary motor cortex). (B). Similar MNs identified in the KA rats. (C). Unsupervised ROI extraction of the sub‐regions in RSFNs. The MNs (solid blue color) overlay to their sub‐regions as referred to in the rat brain atlas, where: C1. FCN overlays on cingulate cortex (green), prelimbic cortex (yellow), and retrosplenial cortex (red); C2. HPN overlays on dorsal (green) and ventral (yellow) hippocampus; C3. THN overlays on thalamus (green); and C4. SMN overlays on primary (yellow) and secondary (green) motor cortex. (D). The normalized area of coverage, which was computed by the percentage of the sub‐regions that were covered by the RSFNs. (E). Summary of all ROIs in the rat brain template.
Ica Of Fmri Toolbox Software Gift Version 4.0b, supplied by SourceForge net, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/ica of fmri toolbox software gift version 4.0b/product/SourceForge net
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
ica of fmri toolbox software gift version 4.0b - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


(A) The within‐network reliability analysis across three experimental trials (Trials 1, 2, and 3: BOLD‐fMRI scan at Days 0–1, Days 2–3, and Days 4–5, respectively) was assessed by the MN sub‐networks in the sham control group. No significant difference was observed in any sub‐networks. (B). The within‐network reliability across three trials was assessed by the MN sub‐networks in the KA group. A significantly large ICA intensity was observed in Trial 2 vs. Trial 1 in the PrR, Trial 2 vs. Trial 1 in the DHpL, and Trial 3 vs. Trial 2 in the DHpR. One asterisk (*) identifies adjusted P values lower than 0.1. (C). Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) reflects the test–retest reliability in four MN sub‐networks in the sham rats and KA rats. It indicated a low‐to‐excellent reliability in sham, while the average reliability dropped in the KA group.

Journal: Epilepsia Open

Article Title: Intrinsic brain network stability during kainic acid‐induced epileptogenesis

doi: 10.1002/epi4.70002

Figure Lengend Snippet: (A) The within‐network reliability analysis across three experimental trials (Trials 1, 2, and 3: BOLD‐fMRI scan at Days 0–1, Days 2–3, and Days 4–5, respectively) was assessed by the MN sub‐networks in the sham control group. No significant difference was observed in any sub‐networks. (B). The within‐network reliability across three trials was assessed by the MN sub‐networks in the KA group. A significantly large ICA intensity was observed in Trial 2 vs. Trial 1 in the PrR, Trial 2 vs. Trial 1 in the DHpL, and Trial 3 vs. Trial 2 in the DHpR. One asterisk (*) identifies adjusted P values lower than 0.1. (C). Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) reflects the test–retest reliability in four MN sub‐networks in the sham rats and KA rats. It indicated a low‐to‐excellent reliability in sham, while the average reliability dropped in the KA group.

Article Snippet: Group‐level BOLD‐fMRI data were analyzed using GICA in the Group ICA of FMRI Toolbox (GIFT) Matlab software to identify MNs during brain resting state.

Techniques: Control

Main networks (MNs) extracted by group ICA and averaged across all experimental trials. The ICA intensity (z‐map) ranged from 0 to 6.5 and represents the significant functional connectivity in each MN. All the MNs were overlaid on a co‐registered rat brain mask to aid structural identification. (A). Axial view of the selected MNs in the sham control rats of the frontal cortex network (FCN, including the orbital frontal and medial frontal cortex areas), hippocampal network (HPN, including the hippocampal and parahippocampal areas), thalamic network (THN, including the thalamus and hypothalamus areas), and the sensorimotor network (SMN, including primary and secondary motor cortex). (B). Similar MNs identified in the KA rats. (C). Unsupervised ROI extraction of the sub‐regions in RSFNs. The MNs (solid blue color) overlay to their sub‐regions as referred to in the rat brain atlas, where: C1. FCN overlays on cingulate cortex (green), prelimbic cortex (yellow), and retrosplenial cortex (red); C2. HPN overlays on dorsal (green) and ventral (yellow) hippocampus; C3. THN overlays on thalamus (green); and C4. SMN overlays on primary (yellow) and secondary (green) motor cortex. (D). The normalized area of coverage, which was computed by the percentage of the sub‐regions that were covered by the RSFNs. (E). Summary of all ROIs in the rat brain template.

Journal: Epilepsia Open

Article Title: Intrinsic brain network stability during kainic acid‐induced epileptogenesis

doi: 10.1002/epi4.70002

Figure Lengend Snippet: Main networks (MNs) extracted by group ICA and averaged across all experimental trials. The ICA intensity (z‐map) ranged from 0 to 6.5 and represents the significant functional connectivity in each MN. All the MNs were overlaid on a co‐registered rat brain mask to aid structural identification. (A). Axial view of the selected MNs in the sham control rats of the frontal cortex network (FCN, including the orbital frontal and medial frontal cortex areas), hippocampal network (HPN, including the hippocampal and parahippocampal areas), thalamic network (THN, including the thalamus and hypothalamus areas), and the sensorimotor network (SMN, including primary and secondary motor cortex). (B). Similar MNs identified in the KA rats. (C). Unsupervised ROI extraction of the sub‐regions in RSFNs. The MNs (solid blue color) overlay to their sub‐regions as referred to in the rat brain atlas, where: C1. FCN overlays on cingulate cortex (green), prelimbic cortex (yellow), and retrosplenial cortex (red); C2. HPN overlays on dorsal (green) and ventral (yellow) hippocampus; C3. THN overlays on thalamus (green); and C4. SMN overlays on primary (yellow) and secondary (green) motor cortex. (D). The normalized area of coverage, which was computed by the percentage of the sub‐regions that were covered by the RSFNs. (E). Summary of all ROIs in the rat brain template.

Article Snippet: Group‐level BOLD‐fMRI data were analyzed using GICA in the Group ICA of FMRI Toolbox (GIFT) Matlab software to identify MNs during brain resting state.

Techniques: Functional Assay, Control, Extraction